A questionnaire stalled the deal
Procurement sent a security review covering access control and AI use. It's been parked for weeks while someone on your team guesses at the answers.
AI Agents Doing Security Work
You have 20–120 employees, no CISO, and a security questionnaire holding up a deal. The Security Sprint puts one guarded system into production in 2–5 weeks: least-privilege access, an audit log you can export, and human approval on every write. You own it at handover.
Plugs into the tools you already run
01The Problem
Procurement sent a security review covering access control and AI use. It's been parked for weeks while someone on your team guesses at the answers.
People are pasting customer data into ChatGPT and Copilot today. Nobody wrote down what's allowed, and nobody can see what's already gone out.
A board member, an investor, or your largest customer asked what your AI agents can reach. The honest answer is that nobody has checked, and the SOC 2 effort is slipping.
You've priced a security hire at $150K and six months. You've been quoted a program that ends in a policy document. There's a middle path: one control, running in production, that you own.
02What You Get
At handover you hold the running system, the access map behind it, and an exportable audit log, in your accounts rather than ours.
03Results
“Our lead-qualification agent books 40% more demos than our old chatbot, and the leads come in pre-qualified.”
“We went from 200 support tickets a week to 80. The agent handles password resets, billing questions, and basic troubleshooting automatically.”
04How It Works
Not a policy generator. Agents that run the control: they scope access down, review what changed, catch data heading somewhere it shouldn't, and answer the questions your buyers keep sending.
Your repos, your identity provider, your cloud account. Read-only until you say otherwise.
Every permission the system holds is named, justified, and revocable in one place.
Each action leaves an entry you can show a customer, an auditor, or your board.
In production in 2–5 weeks, not a six-month program.
Every system ships with scoped access, audit logging, and human-in-the-loop controls on writes, engineered by a founder who ran security for finance and payments companies. You're handing an agent the keys to your stack. We treat that like it matters.
05The Sprint
Pick the one control that's blocking you. Our founder scopes it with you on the kickoff call, then one delivery operator builds it, deploys it, and hands it over in 2–5 weeks, yours to run. Most teams start with whatever sits between them and a stalled deal, then run the same play on the next workflow.

Ranked a top AI company in Japan by Clutch, 2026.
Success metrics we define upfront
→Check your exposure
Three minutes. You'll get a readiness score and the top three gaps to close first.
06Fit Check
→Still on the fence?
Five scorecards, 3 minutes each. Pick your angle, from AI readiness to where your access is exposed.
07Why SimplyCubed
Market rate before benefits, plus 3–6 months to find one and ramp them. The questionnaire is due before they start.
Useful for advice and program direction. It's a recurring bill, it takes weeks to spin up, and it produces documents. Nobody on that retainer is shipping the control.
Generic scope and a report of findings. Fixing what they found is still your job, and nothing runs when they leave.
The Security Sprint ends with a running control you own. Fixed price, 2–5 weeks.
08Investment
Fixed, agreed before we start. One guarded system live in 2–5 weeks, and it's yours at handover.
Optional ongoing support starts at $1,000/mo. Most teams add it after the first system is live, to keep the control tuned and bring the next workflow under the same guardrails.
→Not ready for a $20,000 build?
The Security Readiness Audit maps where your data, your access, and your AI tools are exposed into a readiness heatmap, a prioritized fix list, and a build-ready blueprint you own. $1,500, credited in full toward your Sprint within 30 days. Here's a real one.
09The Guarantee
We agree on your success metrics in writing before we start, something like “least-privilege access on every integration the agent touches” or “an exportable audit log on every write.” If we don't hit them within 30 days of deployment, we keep working at no extra cost until we do. Or we refund 50%.
10FAQ
Neither. Chatbots answer questions and policy tools produce documents. We ship a running system: scoped access, audit logging, and a human approval step on writes. At handover it's live in your accounts, doing the work.
That's the product. Every system ships with least-privilege access, audit logging, and human-in-the-loop controls on writes. Our founder ran security for finance and payments companies, so scoped access is the default here, not an upsell.
Two to five weeks, depending on scope. Week 1 is discovery and scoping, weeks 2–3 are build and integration, week 4 is deployment and tuning.
No. We're not an audit firm and we don't run compliance programs. We ship the controls an audit keeps asking about, so the evidence exists and works when your auditor or your customer asks to see it.
We define your success metrics in writing before we start. If we don't hit them within 30 days of deployment, we keep working at no extra cost until we do. Or we refund 50%.
If you run GitHub, Slack, AWS, Okta, Google Workspace, or most tools with an API, we build directly against them. No rip-and-replace.
You get full documentation and Loom walkthroughs, and the system runs in your accounts, not ours. Many teams add ongoing support (from $1,000/mo) to keep it tuned and bring the next workflow under the same guardrails.

I spent years as a CISO and engineer shipping production systems in finance, payments, and AI, where downtime and bad automation cost real money. SimplyCubed is how I bring that discipline to growing companies: a lean team of senior operators, vetted specialists, and AI agents that ship in weeks what an agency staffs for months.
More about Charles →→Two ways in
The 3-minute readiness check scores where you're exposed and names the top three gaps. The 30-minute call picks the one control worth building first, against your actual stack. Either way, you leave with something specific. No pitch deck.